Wednesday, June 3, 2026
Latest
Replace this ticker with your own real headlines • Keep everything truthful • Point the call-to-action at your external site • Edit all text in the script section below
Home  ›  Opinion
Opinion

I looked for a smarter way to invest — and got my first access to IPOs through crypto

A personal story about moving beyond stocks and ETFs — and reaching IPOs, pre-IPOs and other tools that used to be closed to private investors.

AK
Anna Kovaleva
June 9, 2026 · 7 min read
Photo: building a next-generation portfolio. Replace with your own licensed image and credit.

For several years I invested in a fairly standard way: part of my capital was in conservative instruments, part in stocks and funds, and I experimented a little with crypto. In theory it all looked right: diversification, a long horizon, no excessive risk.

But in practice I increasingly caught myself thinking that this approach didn't satisfy me.

Conservative instruments gave a sense of stability, but a return of around 3–4% a year looked too modest. The stock market demanded time: you have to follow news, reports, rates, indices, entry points. Crypto offered more opportunities, but often turned into endless chart-watching.

At some point I realized: I don't want to become a trader. I want to build capital.

“I didn't want to sit in charts every day. I was looking for a way to invest smarter — not into hype, but into real growth opportunities.”

Why I started looking toward IPOs and pre-IPOs

When you start figuring out where company growth is actually created, you quickly reach a simple conclusion: many strong stories happen before a company becomes available to the mass investor.

By the time it lists, a company is often already well known, its valuation is heated up, and market interest has formed in advance. So I began studying instruments that let you take part in the growth earlier: pre-IPO, IPO Booking and access to companies before or during the public offering.

I used to think such opportunities were available only to large investors, funds, or those with personal connections. But it turned out the market is changing: platforms are appearing that give the private investor access to such deals through a clearer digital infrastructure.

That's how I found Fintch.

What hooked me about Fintch

Fintch turned out not to be yet another “buy a token and wait for growth” app. What hooked me was the idea itself: using crypto-financial infrastructure as a bridge to traditional investment instruments.

On the platform you can explore not only crypto assets but also opportunities beyond the usual public market: IPO Booking, pre-IPO, a crypto index, prediction markets and other tools for broader diversification.

The main thing — it didn't look like a get-rich-quick story. Rather like a way to assemble a next-generation portfolio: not just stocks and funds, but access to deals that used to be closer to private banking.

“For me Fintch became about access, not speculation. For the first time I saw how crypto can work not only as an asset, but as infrastructure for investing in traditional markets.”

First deals: how it worked out in practice

The most interesting direction for me was IPO deals. I submitted applications and received an allocation in several offerings. What matters: in such deals an investor doesn't always get 100% of the requested volume, so it was especially telling for me that the actual allocation turned out very high.

For the most successful IPOs the result looked like this:

Ticker Entry → close price Allocation received Gross profit Net profit after fees
CRWV$40 → $162.095.05%+305.50%+253.4%
CRCL$31 → $111.5094.96%+259.68%+214.9%
KRMN$22 → $44.3094.10%+101.36%+81.9%

What mattered to me here wasn't only the percentages of profit, but the very mechanics of access. I requested an allocation — and ended up receiving more than 94–95% of the stated volume in each of these deals. That's very different from the situation where you see a beautiful IPO in the news but, in fact, can't properly take part in it.

“What surprised me wasn't only the return, but that I actually received most of the requested allocation. In an IPO that's critical: you can find a good deal, but if you're given a tiny volume, the effect on your portfolio is minimal.”

Important: such results don't mean every IPO deal will be successful. Returns aren't guaranteed, and the market can move both ways. But this experience showed me that access to such opportunities really can change a portfolio's structure.

Why it became part of my strategy

After the first deals, I started looking at my portfolio differently.

It used to be built around the familiar classics: a bit of the stock market, a bit of conservative instruments, a bit of crypto. Now the logic has become more systematic:

  • A base layer — for stability and liquidity.
  • A public-market layer — stocks, ETFs, indices.
  • A private-market and IPO layer — to take part in companies before or around their listing.
  • A digital layer — for example, a crypto index, so I don't pick individual coins by hand.
  • Scenario instruments — like prediction markets, which let you work with the probabilities of events.

This approach doesn't cancel the risks. But it offers more opportunities than a classic portfolio, where all the growth depends on the public market.

Why this is especially relevant now

The stock market has become very competitive. Many strong companies are already expensive, and obvious ideas get priced in quickly. When an investor buys public shares, they often enter the story after most of the expectations have already formed.

IPOs and pre-IPOs are interesting precisely because they let you look at companies earlier. Not to earn guaranteed money, but to gain access to a different stage of growth.

For me this became the main discovery: effective investing isn't always about more risk. Sometimes it's about earlier access, a better portfolio structure, and tools that used to be closed to the private investor.

“I wasn't looking for a miracle service. I was looking for a way to be closer to opportunities that usually reach the private investor too late.”

What's important to understand before you start

I wouldn't treat Fintch as a replacement for the whole portfolio. This isn't a story about selling all your assets and putting everything into one deal.

IPOs, pre-IPOs, crypto indices and prediction markets are instruments with different levels of risk, horizon and liquidity. Somewhere there can be high volatility, somewhere exit restrictions, somewhere dependence on the market situation.

But if you treat it as part of diversification, the logic becomes clear: don't bet everything on one asset, but add new sources of potential growth to your portfolio.

The takeaway

My main conclusion is simple: for today's investor it's no longer enough to just hold stocks, funds and cash. The market is changing, companies stay private longer, and a significant share of the growth can happen before an asset becomes available to a mass audience.

Fintch became, for me, a way to go beyond the usual public market and try instruments that previously seemed available only to large investors: IPO Booking, pre-IPO, a crypto index and other solutions at the intersection of traditional finance and crypto infrastructure.

This isn't about quick earnings. It's about broader access, conscious diversification and building capital.

If you, too, want to look wider than stocks, ETFs and ordinary crypto assets, explore Fintch and the opportunities available on the platform.

Look wider than stocks and ETFs

Register and see which next-generation portfolio tools are available right now.

Sign up for Fintch

Disclaimer: the results shown reflect individual historical deals and do not guarantee future returns. Investments, including IPOs, pre-IPOs, digital assets and other alternative instruments, carry risks, including the risk of capital loss, limited liquidity and changes in market value.

Read also
Another article

Comments

4 comments
MK
Marta Kowalska 2 hours ago

Finally a clear explanation. I've been trying to understand this for weeks and this is the first piece that actually made sense to me.

JN
Jakub Nowak Editor 3 hours ago

Thanks for reading! We'll publish a follow-up next week with the full data set and sources, so stay tuned.

AT
Anna Tomczyk 1 hour ago

Can't wait for the sources — that's exactly what was missing from other coverage I read.

PW
Piotr Wiśniewski Yesterday

Good read overall, though I'd love to see how these numbers compare to last year. Any chance of a chart?